Skip to main content

CASE SUMMARIES

Harassment and sexual misconduct - CS042609

A student (student A) made an online report to the provider describing a sexual assault by another student (student B). Three months later student A saw a caseworker to discuss the report in more detail and confirmed that they wanted the provider to take action to investigate the report.

Settlement - CS042612

A provider withdrew a student because of low attendance. The student appealed the decision to withdraw them, saying that their record of attendance had been affected by a faulty access card. The provider reinstated the student on the condition that, by a certain deadline, they would attend all sessions with all attendance swipes recorded and that the student would meet with the student support team.

Student protection - PI112502

Applied Business Academy (ABA)

This case summary about ABA College illustrates the impact on individual students where there is a gap in student protection.

Bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct - CS042509

A student on a professional healthcare course complained about the behaviour of other students on the same course in connection with a piece of group work. They said that they had received inappropriate messages from one member of the group, had been excluded from meetings about group work, locked out of critical documents and there had been disagreements about how to approach the work. The student initially asked for an apology from the rest of the group but didn’t want the matter to be formally recorded on the other students’ records. But the student then said that this was because they were worried about reprisals. On reflection, the student felt that the behaviour was a form of harassment connected to their disability, and that the other student’s behaviour ought to be considered under the provider’s fitness to practice regulations.

Bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct - CS042510

A student beginning a healthcare course at an overseas campus was required to undertake an occupational health assessment. Shortly after the assessment, the student reported to the provider that they had been sexually assaulted by a medical professional employed by the occupational health firm. Around four months later, the student withdrew from the course and made a complaint about the way the provider responded to their disclosure.

Harassment and sexual misconduct - CS022503

This case summary describes a student’s complaint about how their provider responded to their disclosure that they had been sexually assaulted by another student.

Harassment and sexual misconduct - CS022510

This case summary describes a reported student’s complaint about the outcome of their provider’s disciplinary process, the provider decided the student had committed sexual misconduct. It contains a brief description of the sexual misconduct reported by members of staff at the provider.

Harassment and sexual misconduct - CS022509

This case summary describes a reported student’s complaint about the outcome of their provider’s disciplinary process, the provider decided the student had committed sexual misconduct. It contains a brief description of the sexual misconduct reported by other students at the provider.

Harassment and sexual misconduct - CS022507

This case summary describes a reported student’s complaint about their provider’s decision to suspend them as a precautionary measure while it considered whether the student had committed sexual misconduct under its disciplinary procedures. It contains a brief description of the sexual misconduct reported by other students at the provider.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092405

A student was awarded their degree in February 2021. In December 2023 they complained to their provider about the impact of periods of industrial action and the coronavirus pandemic on their studies.

We publish summaries of some of the complaints that we review. We always leave out of the summary any information that might identify the student who made the complaint. In some cases we decide that it is in the public interest to publish a summary of a complaint that includes the name of the provider. 

Latest case summaries