Case summary September 2020 | Not Justified
Several students in a Halls of Residence got into a dispute about noise. Over the course of an evening, a number of messages were exchanged via a group WhatsApp chat, which included offensive language and explicit sexual content.
Case summary September 2020 | Not Justified
A student complained to their provider that the information on its website was misleading.
Case summary September 2020 | Justified
A student complained to us that their provider would not consider their academic appeal, or a complaint from them.
Case summary September 2020 | Partly Justified
A student complained that a member of staff had completed the National Student Survey (NSS) on her behalf during a meeting. Other students also expressed concerns and the matter was raised with the Office for Students (OfS).
Case summary September 2020 | Partly Justified
A student disagreed with the decision to award them a Master’s degree, rather than a PhD.
Case summary September 2020 | Not Justified
A student needed an ergonomic chair. The provider agreed to pay for a chair for use on campus; DSA funding covered the cost of a chair for the student to use at home. Following an assessment with a chair specialist, the chair was supplied to the campus.
Case summary September 2020 | Partly Justified
A student complained to the provider that the course they had completed did not include enough teaching hours at the right standard to enable them to apply for professional accreditation from the relevant professional body.
Case summary October 2019 | Partly Justified
A student nurse was found not fit to practise and their registration on the course of study was terminated. The student had been removed from a student residence in the early hours of the morning for causing a disturbance. Another student in the residence had complained that the student had been harassing them, in person and via social media.
Case summary October 2019 | Not Justified
Before starting a social work course, a student had been employed in an education setting. As a result of an incident at work, their employment was terminated. Their former employer and a professional body started an investigation into whether they were fit to practise.
Case summary October 2019 | Justified
A fitness to practise panel reached a decision that a student was not fit for practice and should not be allowed to continue on the course. The letter to the student told the student they could appeal, and directed them to the academic appeal regulations. The student appealed and the provider rejected the appeal. The student complained to us.
