Case summaries

Student transfer - CS122407

Case summary December 2024 | Not Justified

An undergraduate student began their studies at provider A. They transferred to a course awarded by provider B and delivered by provider C at the end of their first year. The student wanted to transfer onto the second year of the course (level 5), but when they arrived they were initially enrolled on the first year of the course (level 4). After a few weeks the student was allowed to move onto level 5, but they had missed some level 5 teaching.

Student transfer - CS122408

Case summary December 2024 | Partly Justified

A disabled student was studying a foundation year at provider A. Provider A had a partnership with provider B that allowed students studying the foundation year to apply to transfer directly into a degree programme offered by provider B. The student’s agreed reasonable adjustments weren’t properly put in place for their second semester exams, so the student was offered the opportunity to re-sit the exams as a first attempt during the summer re-sit period.

Student transfer - CS122409

Case summary December 2024 | Not Justified

A first-year undergraduate student complained to their provider that their request to transfer to a different course had been unfairly rejected. The student explained in their complaint that they’d experienced a difficult few years, which had impacted their studies. They said they had needed to apply for an additional year of funding to be able to continue with their studies and this was therefore their last chance to be able to complete a degree.

Student transfer - CS122410

Case summary December 2024 | Settled

A student was studying for a professionally regulated course. During their second year the professional, statutory and regulatory body (PSRB) withdrew its accreditation because it had concerns about the standard of the course and the course was closed. Arrangements were made to transfer students to a different provider, which would require them to extend their studies. The original course provider developed transfer support and compensation packages for students.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092401

Case summary October 2024 | Partly Justified

A postgraduate student complained to their provider about the tuition fees they were charged after returning from a leave of absence. They said the fees office had initially told them no further fees were due. They thought that the total fee amount they were being asked to pay for the course was incorrect.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092402

Case summary October 2024 | Not Justified

A postgraduate student complained to their provider about the fees they had been charged for their course. The student explained that the unconditional offer letter the provider had sent to them before they joined the course said the fees were £0. They didn’t agree that they should have to pay the tuition fees they’d later been invoiced for.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092403

Case summary October 2024 | Partly Justified

An undergraduate student complained to their provider about several aspects of their course and said they hadn’t received the experience described in the provider’s prospectus. The provider did not uphold the student’s complaint, but it offered them £250 as compensation for delays in its handling of the complaint.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092404

Case summary October 2024 | Justified

A first-year undergraduate student was withdrawn from their course because they didn’t pass their resit attempt at a core module. They submitted an academic appeal and explained that their performance had been negatively impacted by issues related to module delivery and a lack of support from their academic personal tutor.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092405

Case summary October 2024 | Not Justified

A student was awarded their degree in February 2021. In December 2023 they complained to their provider about the impact of periods of industrial action and the coronavirus pandemic on their studies.

Service issues including consumer rights - CS092406

Case summary October 2024 | Not Justified

A postgraduate student complained to their provider that they hadn’t had been able to complete an industrial placement as part of their course because the process for applying for placements had been unclear.

We publish summaries of some of the complaints that we review. We always leave out of the summary any information that might identify the student who made the complaint. In some cases we decide that it is in the public interest to publish a summary of a complaint that includes the name of the provider.

Publication of case summaries and public interest cases

PDF, 105Kb