Case summary February 2025 | Partly Justified
This case summary describes a reported student’s complaint about the outcome of their provider’s disciplinary process, the provider decided the student had committed sexual misconduct. It contains a brief description of the sexual misconduct reported by members of staff at the provider.
Case summary February 2025 | Justified
This case summary describes a reported student’s complaint about the outcome of their provider’s disciplinary process, the provider decided the student had committed sexual misconduct. It contains a brief description of the sexual misconduct reported by other students at the provider.
Case summary February 2025 | Not Justified
This case summary describes a reported student’s complaint about their provider’s decision to suspend them as a precautionary measure while it considered whether the student had committed sexual misconduct under its disciplinary procedures. It contains a brief description of the sexual misconduct reported by other students at the provider.
Case summary October 2024 | Not Justified
A student was awarded their degree in February 2021. In December 2023 they complained to their provider about the impact of periods of industrial action and the coronavirus pandemic on their studies.
Case summary October 2024 | Justified
A first-year undergraduate student was withdrawn from their course because they didn’t pass their resit attempt at a core module. They submitted an academic appeal and explained that their performance had been negatively impacted by issues related to module delivery and a lack of support from their academic personal tutor.
Case summary October 2024 | Partly Justified
A student complained to their provider that their course wasn’t good value for money. They said the library resources were insufficient, that online services were poor, and that there had been delays in receiving feedback and approval for their dissertation proposal.
Case summary October 2024 | Not Justified
A postgraduate student complained to their provider that they hadn’t had been able to complete an industrial placement as part of their course because the process for applying for placements had been unclear.
Case summary June 2024 | Partly Justified
A student was registered on a full-time MRes programme. At the end of two years of study, students who met certain academic requirements could be considered for transfer onto a PhD programme.
Case summary May 2024 | Settled
A student affected by generalised anxiety disorder was part of a cohort affected by industrial action.
Case summary March 2024 | Justified
A postgraduate student enrolled on a two-year programme. The second year of the programme was an optional industrial placement. Toward the end of their first year the student successfully secured a placement and provided details to the programme’s placement team.
We publish summaries of some of the complaints that we review. We always leave out of the summary any information that might identify the student who made the complaint. In some cases we decide that it is in the public interest to publish a summary of a complaint that includes the name of the provider.
